Files
Codeman maintainer beae377122 feat(codex): read approval, question and trust dialogs off the screen
Codex is the one CLI Codeman launches with its approvals on by default, and
it declares `hooks: 'none'`, so nothing tells Codeman it stopped to ask. A
codex session parked on "Would you like to run the following command?" read
as plainly idle, and one parked on a question read as WORKING, because the
question's own key hints end in `esc to interrupt`, codex's working line.

This adds a generic, optional registry field,
`capabilities.workDetect.blockedLine` (plus `blockedLines`, the window), and
the session state that reads it:

- `isBlockedScreen()` (session-activity.ts, pure) joins the last
  `blockedLines` non-blank rows of a capture and tests the pattern once, so a
  pattern can demand several markers and anchor the dialog's footer on the
  end of the window.
- `Session` reads it off the same capture the idle confirmation already
  takes, emits `blockedChanged`, and exposes `screenBlocked`. It raises on
  one reading, and while a dialog is up re-reads the screen every 2 s,
  because answering resumes the turn and a busy pane would not reach the
  settle path again until the turn ended. It clears only after two readable
  captures in a row without the dialog, so a capture taken mid-repaint cannot
  clear and re-raise it; an unreadable capture changes nothing. A blocked
  screen wins over the working line in the same capture.
- The pattern goes through `compileVersionRegex()` in both the schema refine
  and at use (lazily cached), like every other config regex.

Codex's pattern was measured on a live codex-cli 0.162.0 pane on 2026-10-14
(`-a on-request -s read-only`, widths 200 down to 36): it needs a `› N.`
option row and then the dialog's key-hint row as the last row, allowing for
that row to wrap below about 60 columns. Command, edit and network-escalation
approvals, single and multi-question dialogs and the startup trust prompt
match; the idle and working views, menus the user opened (`/model`,
`/permissions`, `/review`), the composer holding the dialogs' words and a
transcript quoting them verbatim do not. `Implement this plan?` is left out
on purpose: its footer is the same as `/model`'s and the turn has ended
there. The captures are kept as fixtures (trailing whitespace trimmed, the
scratch path replaced).

Nothing consumes `blockedChanged` yet; the next commit raises the alert.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-14 05:18:24 +02:00
..